Skip to main content
Log in

Classes of Analytic Functions Defined by a Differential Operator Related to Conic Domains

  • Published:
Ukrainian Mathematical Journal Aims and scope

Let A be the class of functions f(z) = z + ∑ k = 2 a k z k analytic in an open unit disc ∆. We use a generalized linear operator closely related to the multiplier transformation to study certain subclasses of A mapping ∆ onto conic domains. Using the principle of the differential subordination and the techniques of convolution, we investigate several properties of these classes, including some inclusion relations and convolution and coefficient bounds. In particular, we get many known and new results as special cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Aghalary and G. H. Azadi, “The Dziok–Srivastava operator and k-uniformly starlike functions,” J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 6, No. 2, 1–7 (2005), Article 52 (electronic).

  2. R. M. Ali, “Starlikeness associated with parabolic regions,” Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 4, 561–570 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. F. M. Al-Oboudi, “On univalent functions defined by a generalized Salagean operator,” Int. J. Math. Math. Sci., 27, 1429–1436 (2004).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. F. M. Al-Oboudi and K. A. Al-Amoudi, “On classes of analytic functions related to conic domains,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 339, 655–667 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. R. Bharti, R. Parvatham, and A. Swaminathan, “On subclasses of uniformly convex functions and corresponding class of starlike functions,” Tamkang J. Math., 28, No. 1, 17–32 (1997).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. B. C. Carlson and D. B. Shaffer, “Starlike and prestarlike hypergeometric functions,” SIAM J. Math. Anal., 15, No. 4, 737–745 (1984).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. E. Deniz and H. Orhan, “The Fekete-Szegö problem for a generalized subclass of analytic functions,” Kyungpook Math. J., 50, 37–47 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. P. L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Springer-Verlag, New York (1983).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A.W. Goodman, “On uniformly convex functions,” Ann. Pol. Math., 56, 87–92 (1991).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kanas and A. Wiśniowska, “Conic regions and k-uniform convexity, II,” Folia Sci. Univ. Techn. Resov., 170, 65–78 (1998).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Kanas and A. Wiśniowska, “Conic regions and k-uniform convexity,” Comput. Appl. Math., 105, 327–336 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kanas and A. Wiśniowska, “Conic domains and starlike functions,” Rev. Roum. Math. Pures Appl., 45, No. 3, 647–657 (2000).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Kanas and T. Yaguchi, “Subclasses of k-uniformly convex and starlike functions defined by generalized derivate, I,” Indian J. Pure Appl. Math., 32, No. 9, 1275–1282 (2001).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Kanas and T. Yaguchi, “Subclasses of k-uniformly convex and starlike functions defined by generalized derivative, II,” Publ. Inst. Math., 69, No. 83, 91–100 (2001).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Yi Ling and S. Ding, “A class of analytic functions defined by fractional derivation,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., 186, 504–513 (1994).

  16. W. Ma and D. Minda, “Uniformly convex functions,” Ann. Pol. Math., 57, 165–175 (1992).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Magdas, “On alpha-type uniformly convex functions,” Stud. Univ. Babes-Bolyai Inform., 44, No. 1, 11–17 (1999).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. A. K. Mishra and P. Gochhayat, “Applications of the Owa–Srivastava operator to the class of k-uniformly convex functions,” Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal., 9, No. 4, 323–331 (2006).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. K. I. Noor, M. Arif, and W. Ul-Haq, “On k-uniformly close-to-convex functions of complex order,” Appl. Math. Comput., 215, 629–635 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. H. Orhan, E. Deniz, and D. Răducanu, “The Fekete-Szegö problem for subclasses of analytic functions defined by a differential operator related to conic domains,” Comput. Math. Appl., 59, 283–295 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. S. Owa, “On the distortion theorems, I,” Kyungpook Math. J., 18, No. 1, 53–59 (1978).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Owa and H. M. Srivastava, “Univalent and starlike generalized hypergeometric functions,” Can. J. Math., 39, No. 5, 1057–1077 (1987).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Ramachandran, T. N. Shanmugam, H. M. Srivastava, and A. Swaminathan, “A unified class of k-uniformly convex functions defined by the Dziok–Srivastava linear operator,” Appl. Math. Comput., 190, No. 2, 1627–1636 (2007).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. M. S. Robertson, “On the theory of univalent functions,” Ann. Math., 37, No. 2, 374–408 (1936).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Rogosinski, “On the coefficients of subordinate functions,” Proc. London Math. Soc., 48, 48–82 (1943).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. F. Rønning, “On starlike functions associated with parabolic regions,” Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Sklodowska Sect. A, 45, No. 14, 117–122 (1991).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Rønning, “Uniformly convex functions and a corresponding class of starlike functions,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 118, No. 1, 189–196 (1993).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. D. Răducanu and H. Orhan, “Subclasses of analytic functions defined by a generalized differential operator,” Int. J. Math. Anal., 4, No. 1-4, 1–15 (2010).

  29. St. Ruscheweyh, “Convolutions in geometric function theory,” Sem. Math. Sup., Presses Univ. de Montreal, Vol. 83 (1982).

  30. St. Rusheweyh, “New criteria for univalent functions,” Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 49, 109–115 (1975).

  31. St. Ruscheweyh and T. Sheil-Small, “Hadamard products of Schlicht functions and the Pólya–Schöenberg conjecture,” Comment. Math. Helv., 48, 119–135 (1973).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. G. S. Sălăgean, “Subclasses of univalent functions,” Lect. Notes Math.: Complex Analysis, Fifth Romanian-Finnish Sem., Bucharest, 1981, Springer, Berlin, 1013 (1983), pp. 362–372.

  33. H. M. Srivastava, A. K. Mishra, and M. K. Das, “A nested class of analytic functions defined by fractional calculus,” Comm. Appl. Anal., 2, No. 3, 321–332 (1998).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. H. M. Srivastava and A. K. Mishra, “Applications of fractional calculus to parabolic starlike and uniformly convex functions,” J. Comput. Math. Appl., 39, No. 3/4, 57–69 (2000).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published in Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal, Vol. 67, No. 9, pp. 1217–1231, September, 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deniz, E., Orhan, H. & Sokół, J. Classes of Analytic Functions Defined by a Differential Operator Related to Conic Domains. Ukr Math J 67, 1367–1385 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-016-1159-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-016-1159-8

Keywords

Navigation