On the proximate order and lower proximate order for meromorphic functions

Authors

  • M. Zabolotskyy Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
  • T. Zabolotskyy Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
  • M. Mostova Lviv State University of Physical Culture named after Ivan Boberskyj

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3842/umzh.v78i7-8.9342

Keywords:

meromorphic function, proximate order, lower proximate order

Abstract

For a function $\Gamma(r)=\exp\left\{\displaystyle\int\nolimits_1^r\dfrac{\gamma(t)}{t}dt\right\},$ $\gamma(r)$ is a proximate order, we deduce the expression $\Gamma(r)=r^{\gamma(r)}L(r),$ where $L(r)$ is a slowly varying function on $[1,+\infty),$ i.e., $rL'(r)/L(r)\to 0$ as $r\to+\infty.$ We define the notions of proximate order $\rho(r)$ and proximate lower order $\lambda(r)$ of a function $f$ meromorphic in $\mathbb{C}$ such that either $\underline{\Delta}(D)=\liminf_{r\to+\infty}T(r,f)/D(r)>0$ and $\overline{\Delta}(H)=\limsup_{r\to+\infty}T(r,f)/H(r)=+\infty$ or $\underline{\Delta}(D)=0$ and $\overline{\Delta}(H)<+\infty,$ where $D(r)=\exp\left\{\displaystyle\int\nolimits_1^r\dfrac{\rho(t)}{t}dt\right\}$ and $H(r)=\exp\left\{\displaystyle\int\nolimits_1^r\dfrac{\lambda(t)}{t}dt\right\}.$ The obtained results reveal the incorrectness of Lemma 1 and Theorem 1 from the paper by S. H. Dwivedi [S. H. Dwivedi,  Compos. Math., 22, No. 1, 39–48 (1970)]. We also generalize the statement of Lemma 2 in the cited paper as follows: If a function $\phi(r)$ is such that $r\phi'(r)/\phi(r)\to\phi_0$ as $r \to +\infty,$ then $\displaystyle\int\nolimits_1^r\dfrac{\phi(t)}{t^{1+\alpha}}dt \sim \dfrac{\phi(r)}{(\phi_0-\alpha)r^\alpha}$ for $0 \le \alpha < \phi_0$ and $\displaystyle\int\nolimits_r^{+\infty}\dfrac{\phi(t)}{t^{1+\alpha}}dt \sim \dfrac{\phi(r)}{(\alpha-\phi_0)r^\alpha}$ for $\alpha > \phi_0$ as $r \to +\infty.$

References

1. A. A. Goldberg, I. V. Ostrovskii, Value distributions of meromorphic functions, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2008).

2. G. Valiron, Lectures on the general theory of integral functions, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York (1949).

3. S. M. Shah, A note on lower proximate orders, J. Indian Math. Soc., 12, № 1-2, 31–32 (1948).

4. M. M. Sheremeta, On the connection between the growth of the maximum modulus of an entire function and the moduli of the coefficients of its power series expansion, Amer. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 2, 88, 291–301 (1970).

5. T. Ya. Hlova, P. V. Filevych, Generalized types of the growth of Dirichlet series, Carpathian Math. Publ., 7, № 2, 172–187 (2015); https://doi:10.15330/cmp.7.2.172-187.

6. S. Datta, T. Biswas, On $L^*$-proximate order of meromorphic function, Sahand Commun. Math. Anal., 10, № 1, 29–35 (2018).

7. T. Ya. Hlova, P. V. Filevych, The growth of entire Dirichlet series in terms of generalized orders, Sb. Math., 209, № 2, 241–257 (2018); https://doi:10.1070/SM8644.

8. I. Chyzhykov, P. Filevych, J. Rättyä, Generalization of proximate order and applications, Comput. Methods Funct. Theory, 22, 445–470 (2022).

9. T. Biswas, Ch. Biswas, A note on $phi$-proximate order of meromorphic functions, Honam Math. J., 45, № 1, 42–53 (2023).

10. S. H. Dwivedi, Meromorphic functions of regular growth, Compos. Math., 22, № 1, 39–48 (1970).

11. J. Clunie, On integral functions having prescribed asymptotic growth, Canad. J. Math., 17, № 3, 396–404 (1965).

Published

24.07.2026

Issue

Section

Research articles